"Saddam Should Have Been Studied, Not Executed" is the title of
Richard Dawkins (
author of
The God Delusion) latest
article in the LA Times. His article suggests that we need to take the time to study him to find out what makes him tick. This seems to me to be a contradiction to
Dawkins own worldview in the sense that he wants to find out what gave him his evil "values." Why? This is coming from a man who marginalizes any notion of values and those who hold values. Especially those values derived from a delusional God. This is nothing more than
Dawkin's attempt to gain some sympathy from liberal progressive anti-capital punishment crowd, while trying to gain support for his own brand of atheistic
"religion." I would rather him say that he would like to study people who display altruistic behavior. I think we could learn
allot more from them. But
realistically how do you "study' these people either good or evil? I feel that the findings from each study would be pretty much the same. That being "not much." So give it up Mr.
Dawkins. I would rather see your "Christian hating" ...
oops I mean atheistic.... media tour in an effort to gain new converts to your church, than read this delusional nonsense.